| The
general conclusion we can make about the development of phlox cultivars
during the time the genus has been in cultivation is that there has
been surprisingly little in the way of planned breeding toward specific
goals. This has been done with P. paniculata and
perhaps to some degree with P. subulata, but as
for the other species there has been simply selection from wild
populations, garden collected seed, or chance seedlings. The P. paniculata breeders
have had clear goals in mind. Symons-Jeune was interested in breeding
plants for the landscape border, and had a clear picture in his mind of
plants with large flowers ("pips") of clear color and well-filled and
-proportioned panicles ("trusses") that could be appreciated from some
distance. Alan Bloom originally grew plants for the cut flower market
and would have had even more exacting standards of flower and panicle
quality. The modern Dutch breeders have size specifications in mind,
and American breeders look for mildew resistance combined with
traditional size and flower appearance. In fact many of the
new
American cultivars are simply found seedlings that do not differ much
from wild forms. It is as if  this selection is going on in
complete disregard of any previous breeding work that has
been done.   These goals are just part of what should be
considered in a breeding program. The sidebar at right lists all of the
traits that I can think of that are important to phlox as a whole as
garden plants along with the direction of their desirable expression.
Some of the traits are concerned with survival in the garden and
others, like "not sticky glandular," with being gardener-friendly. But
most are related to appearance – shape or color. This sort of value
system assumes that there are aesthetic standards that can be applied
to plant appearance. This seems to be a universally accepted
assumption, and, presumably the mind judges plants using some of the same
criteria as for works of art. These standards do not apply to plants
that are bizarre mutations and marketed as novelties. Sources of Desirable Traits Obviously the normal traits that
are found in wild plants are those that have evolved for the greatest
fitness under natural conditions. Growth habit is an adaptation to the
site; flower structure and color are adaptations for pollination. What
humans find desirable in plants may have little to do with fitness in
nature. The plants that we refer to as “improved” seem better to us
only because their growth habits and proportions or their petal
coloration are more pleasing. We can breed plants that have the
degree of expression we want of series of desirable traits by 1)
finding unusual individuals with desirable single traits and bringing
them into our stock, 2) by recombining groups of traits that tend
toward the desirable, or 3) by hybridizing with other subspecies or
species that have these traits. In the case of 1 and 2 we are working
within the normal boundaries of variation in the subspecies or species,
and the results of the crosses that we make will be more or less
predictable since the gene combinations that result in trait expression
are similar. With 3 we are moving into unpredictable territory, since
different genes may be used in wild populations to produce similar
phenotypes. When these genes are combined in hybrids the phenotypes
produced may be outside the normal range of either parental type. For
example, crossing two species of short stature may produce a set of F1
hybrids that have a wide range of heights from shorter to taller than
the range of heights of either parental species. Other traits such as
flower color may be affected in novel ways. The range of cultivar forms in P.
paniculata gives some indication of what sort of variation is
possible in garden phlox. In addition to the forms and flower colors of
P. paniculata there are also different
traits from other species that could be brought together. Even when
direct hybridization between certain species or cultivars does not
work, it may be possible to bring about recombination through other
more compatible plants.  
 | 
| PHLOX TRAITS Varying trait | 
 Desirable direction
 |  
| Overall Height X width (non-moss)
 Sturdiness
 Bushiness (density)
 Degree of floral cover
 Rate of spread
 Bloom time and duration
 Hardiness
 Ease of cultivation
 Disease and pest resistance
 | stocky
but not squat
 stays erect, not floppy
 medium to dense
 approaching 100%
 slowly spreading clump
 early and long
 very hardy
 very easy
 high
 |  
| Foliage Color
 Sheen
 Texture
 Pubescence
 Leaf size
 Leaf shape
 | dark
green
 shiny
 thick
 not sticky glandular
 in proportion
 pointed, about 1:4 or 1:5 W:L
 |  
| Stems Color
 Pubescence
 Basal angle
 Strength
 Internode length
 | dark
 not sticky glandular
 approaching 90 degrees
 sturdy
 in proportion
 |  
| Flower panicle Length
 Shape
 Number of flowers
 Density
 | in proportion to overall
 rounded
 20-30 flowers open at once
 flowers touching, not crowded
 |  
| Flower Size
 Color
 Corolla plane
 Petal lobe width
 Tube length
 Scent
 | large,
up to >30mm diameter
 clear, not muddy
 nearly flat
 wide to make full corolla
 in proportion
 sweet, pronounced
 |  |